Friday 3rd February
Margaret Thatcher once stupidly declared that there was no such thing as society. Maybe she instantly regretted it, or maybe her minders told her she should be more circumspect in future, but she never repeated it. Of course there is such a thing as society, and public opinion is a large part of that. But how do we measure public opinion, I mean really discern what the public is thinking, not what they are being told by an ever more strident Media. Sometimes society’s views, public opinion if you will, becomes overwhelmingly obvious, such as over MPs expenses, or the News of the World hacking into missing Milly Dowler’s phone, but these occasions are rarer than you think. Often the so-called public furore is actually being quite well orchestrated by politicians or a lobby group, and sometimes the papers, closely followed by the TV news who jump on a bandwagon which was hardly moving until their added weight sends it careering down the hill of public opinion. Were people really up in arms about Stephen Hester’s bonus, was society really clamouring for the knighthood, and almost a head on a pole, of Fred Goodwin, or are we all being manipulated in some more sinister way. If you think about it, these poor (or rich, depends which way you look at it) individuals were just the private victims of a more public disquiet about our society. Why is it that the rich and famous, as well as receiving quite ridiculously high paychecks, also qualify for almost automatic bonuses and awards, plaudits and praise or worse if they fall foul of certain views. It is actually quite hard nowadays to be a business leader or a pop star or a footballer without praise and opprobrium being heaped upon one in almost equal measure. Maybe this is the inevitable end result of the increasingly fervid celebrity culture we all, to some extent, live in.
And now we are entering into the realm of the celebrity trial. Whether John Terry actually abused Anton Ferdinand or not is hardly worth a trial is it? What were the words he either actually used or that Mr. Ferdinand thinks he heard him say? And what was his intention, is it not just as important that one’s intention has some weight rather than just the perception of the receiver of those words. Anyway I was always brought up to say to girls who might try to bully one, who poked you in the ribs or slapped your arm with a ruler when Miss wasn’t looking, “Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” And their words were quite hurtful enough too, I can tell you. Should I have insisted that they be publicly humiliated and forced to repeat them in a public trial. And is it public opinion that is driving this, or is it just one section of an ever more intolerant society? What do people waiting for the 97 bus think of it, or has no-one actually asked them? The most ludicrous thing is that at the very same moment as John Terry said whatever he did say, in anger and frustration no doubt, and probably deeply regretted later, thousands in the crowd were chanting quite obscene and racist slogans to their hearts content safe in the knowledge that as a crowd, as part of society they would never be brought to book for it. Strange world isn’t it?
